Difference between revisions of "Proposal - Conscientiopedia"

From Conscienciopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
 
m (Reverted edit of 64.116.191.8, changed back to last version by 67.180.16.242)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
# Cosmoethics. To base all the activities upon the principles of [[Cosmoethics]].
 
# Cosmoethics. To base all the activities upon the principles of [[Cosmoethics]].
 
# Openness. To be open without any restrictions to contribution, even the anonymous one.
 
# Openness. To be open without any restrictions to contribution, even the anonymous one.
−
# License. To allow the free use of all information available in Conscientiopedia according to [[GNU license]] documentation.
+
# License. To allow the free use of all information available in Conscientiopedia according to [[GNU Free Documentation License]].
 
# Supra-institutional. To be supra-institutional without publicizing or being involved with any particular [[Conscientiocentrical Institution]].
 
# Supra-institutional. To be supra-institutional without publicizing or being involved with any particular [[Conscientiocentrical Institution]].
 
# Profits. To be non-profit and by no means limit or restrict the access to the utilization of the content in order to fund the Conscientiopedia project.
 
# Profits. To be non-profit and by no means limit or restrict the access to the utilization of the content in order to fund the Conscientiopedia project.
  
−
Neothosenes. Differently from the conventional encyclopedias, Conscientiopedia not only seeks to systematize the existing knowledge but is also open to new approaches to the themes of Conscientiology. The volunteers can propose new entries, lists, synonymies, analogies, neologisms, wordmeanings, relations, comparisons and much more. Conscientiopedia admits neothosenes. However, all the work is exposed to the proofreading of other volunteers and the neoideas are kept only if they are able to sustain themselves with logics before the collective critiquing.
+
Neothosenes. Differently from the conventional encyclopedias, Conscientiopedia not only seeks to systematize the existing knowledge but is also open to new approaches to the themes of Conscientiology. The volunteers can propose new entries, lists, synonymies, analogies, neologisms, wordmeanings, relations, comparisons and much more. Conscientiopedia admits neothosenes. However, all the work is exposed to the proofreading of other volunteers and the neoideas are kept only if they are able to sustain themselves with logics before the collective critique.
  
−
== What Conscientiopedia is not ==
+
3eu1fb  <a href="http://ragghsudoroe.com/">ragghsudoroe</a>, [url=http://cihuluyzmokh.com/]cihuluyzmokh[/url], [link=http://ohbdqsfhuzpi.com/]ohbdqsfhuzpi[/link], http://ixjncutejeoo.com/
−
Misunderstandings. To avoid misunderstandings and interpretation mistakes, there is the list of items not included in the proposal of Conscientiopedia.
 
−
 
 
−
# Conscientiopedia ''is not'' the [[Encyclopedia of Conscientiology]] proposed and written by Professor [[Waldo Vieira]]. Conscientiopedia ''is'' the result of the digital volunteering of the researchers of Conscientiology.
 
−
# Conscientiopedia ''is not'' edited by Professor [[Waldo Vieira]]. Conscientiopedia ''is'' edited by you, volunteer of the digital [[clarification task]].
 
−
# Conscientiopedia ''is not'' the effort of the [[CHSC]] solely. Conscientiopedia ''is'' supra-institutional and surges from [[Holocycle]].
 
−
# Conscientiopedia ''is not'' a space to digitize the classic works of Conscientiology. Conscientiopedia ''is'' a space for the production of new content free of copyright.
 
−
# Conscientiopedia ''is not'' a space for marketing or self-promotion.
 

Latest revision as of 04:00, 21 October 2009

Current Stage

Stage. Conscientiopedia is in the stage of promotion and clarification of the advantages of its application as an evolutionary tool as well as its actuation as a catalyst for assistantial productivity.

Disseminator. Some researchers are being invited to take part of this stage to get to know the resources and later become disseminator.

The Proposal of Conscientiopedia

Guidelines. The following are six fundamental guidelines for the works of Conscientiopedia:

  1. Environment. To be an environment of contribution to the development and cataloging of knowledge under the scrutiny of the Consciential Paradigm.
  2. Cosmoethics. To base all the activities upon the principles of Cosmoethics.
  3. Openness. To be open without any restrictions to contribution, even the anonymous one.
  4. License. To allow the free use of all information available in Conscientiopedia according to GNU Free Documentation License.
  5. Supra-institutional. To be supra-institutional without publicizing or being involved with any particular Conscientiocentrical Institution.
  6. Profits. To be non-profit and by no means limit or restrict the access to the utilization of the content in order to fund the Conscientiopedia project.

Neothosenes. Differently from the conventional encyclopedias, Conscientiopedia not only seeks to systematize the existing knowledge but is also open to new approaches to the themes of Conscientiology. The volunteers can propose new entries, lists, synonymies, analogies, neologisms, wordmeanings, relations, comparisons and much more. Conscientiopedia admits neothosenes. However, all the work is exposed to the proofreading of other volunteers and the neoideas are kept only if they are able to sustain themselves with logics before the collective critique.

3eu1fb <a href="http://ragghsudoroe.com/">ragghsudoroe</a>, [url=http://cihuluyzmokh.com/]cihuluyzmokh[/url], [link=http://ohbdqsfhuzpi.com/]ohbdqsfhuzpi[/link], http://ixjncutejeoo.com/

Retrieved from "http://en.conscienciopedia.org/index.php?title=Proposal_-_Conscientiopedia&oldid=43357"