Difference between revisions of "Proposal - Conscientiopedia"

From Conscienciopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 14: Line 14:
 
# Profits. To be non-profit and by no means limit or restrict the access to the utilization of the content in order to fund the Conscientiopedia project.
 
# Profits. To be non-profit and by no means limit or restrict the access to the utilization of the content in order to fund the Conscientiopedia project.
  
Neothosenes. Differently from the conventional encyclopedias, Conscientiopedia not only seeks to systematize the existing knowledge but is also open to new approaches to the themes of Conscientiology. The volunteers can propose new entries, lists, synonymies, analogies, neologisms, wordmeanings, relations, comparisons and much more. Conscientiopedia admits neothosenes. However, all the work is exposed to the proofreading of other volunteers and the neoideas are kept only if they are able to sustain themselves with logics before the collective critiquing.
+
Neothosenes. Differently from the conventional encyclopedias, Conscientiopedia not only seeks to systematize the existing knowledge but is also open to new approaches to the themes of Conscientiology. The volunteers can propose new entries, lists, synonymies, analogies, neologisms, wordmeanings, relations, comparisons and much more. Conscientiopedia admits neothosenes. However, all the work is exposed to the proofreading of other volunteers and the neoideas are kept only if they are able to sustain themselves with logics before the collective critique.
  
 
== What Conscientiopedia is not ==
 
== What Conscientiopedia is not ==

Revision as of 22:16, 15 June 2008

Current Stage

Stage. Conscientiopedia is in the stage of promotion and clarification of the advantages of its application as an evolutionary tool as well as its actuation as a catalyst for assistantial productivity.

Disseminator. Some researchers are being invited to take part of this stage to get to know the resources and later become disseminator.

The Proposal of Conscientiopedia

Guidelines. The following are six fundamental guidelines for the works of Conscientiopedia:

  1. Environment. To be an environment of contribution to the development and cataloging of knowledge under the scrutiny of the Consciential Paradigm.
  2. Cosmoethics. To base all the activities upon the principles of Cosmoethics.
  3. Openness. To be open without any restrictions to contribution, even the anonymous one.
  4. License. To allow the free use of all information available in Conscientiopedia according to GNU Free Documentation License.
  5. Supra-institutional. To be supra-institutional without publicizing or being involved with any particular Conscientiocentrical Institution.
  6. Profits. To be non-profit and by no means limit or restrict the access to the utilization of the content in order to fund the Conscientiopedia project.

Neothosenes. Differently from the conventional encyclopedias, Conscientiopedia not only seeks to systematize the existing knowledge but is also open to new approaches to the themes of Conscientiology. The volunteers can propose new entries, lists, synonymies, analogies, neologisms, wordmeanings, relations, comparisons and much more. Conscientiopedia admits neothosenes. However, all the work is exposed to the proofreading of other volunteers and the neoideas are kept only if they are able to sustain themselves with logics before the collective critique.

What Conscientiopedia is not

Misunderstandings. To avoid misunderstandings and interpretation mistakes, there is the list of items not included in the proposal of Conscientiopedia.

  1. Conscientiopedia is not the Encyclopedia of Conscientiology proposed and written by Professor Waldo Vieira. Conscientiopedia is the result of the digital volunteering of the researchers of Conscientiology.
  2. Conscientiopedia is not edited by Professor Waldo Vieira. Conscientiopedia is edited by you, volunteer of the digital clarification task.
  3. Conscientiopedia is not the effort of the CHSC solely. Conscientiopedia is supra-institutional and surges from Holocycle.
  4. Conscientiopedia is not a space to digitize the classic works of Conscientiology. Conscientiopedia is a space for the production of new content free of copyright.
  5. Conscientiopedia is not a space for marketing or self-promotion.